
Predator. Predatory. Predatory behaviour. Listen in on any of my professional conversations or read any of my reports and you would know that these words feature in my work many times each day. They are associated with many different types of crime.
In recent times, the same words have been banded around across all forms of media and particularly in relation to sexual crime. I’m not sure what the words conjure up in the public mind but, I observed on much more than one occasion, the thinking that somehow the behaviour was not so bad, not so serious, not so criminal as sexual offences themselves. Maybe such minimisation is, as remains common in relation to sexual crime, reflecting a wish not to know. If that is so, then it is a highly dangerous and permission giving wish indeed.
Being a predator and engaging in predatory behaviour is a complex business. Like much about crime, it does not ‘just happen’. Predatory behaviour is always supported by predatory thinking and predatory feelings, intelligence, fantasy, rehearsal, practice, preparation, intent. It will relate to and play a particular part in the dynamics of entitlement, power, callousness, objectification and victimisation. To do it well will also involve time, commitment, planning and resourcing. All of this, without exception, resides within the predator and makes clear the level of the risk and dangerousness they pose to others.
For once, I want to use an example of a female predator. There is a not insignificant number of predatory women in the criminal justice system. They are of immense concern. But at least we know about those. There will of course be many others that we don’t know about and need to.
Ms Ghislaine Maxwell is a useful example and in my professional experience she is no exception. Her internal world no different in content than the cohort of her fellow male sexual offenders. It is disturbing then to note that some still seek to minimise her crimes, risk and dangerousness by reasoning of her gender and lessening of the specific role she played. Nothing could be so further from the truth. The chilling testimony of her victims leaves us in no doubt of the predatory process:
“She was really the mastermind of this whole pyramid system he had working. She would go to spa’s and hand out cards saying that she had a very wealthy benefactor who’s going to help you with your schooling, make you a model, all these promises.”
Promises are seductive and especially so when targeted at the girls whom Ghislaine preyed on. Those preyed on were homeless and some were addicted to drugs. She and Epstein did not victimise girls who were Olympic stars and Hollywood actresses. They like the majority of sexual offenders victimised people they thought nobody would ever listen to. The silencing of victims, the disbelief they meet with, the wish of others not to know and the need of others to deny were, as with all predators, were all part of the criminal process.
Whilst promises and seductive threats are controlling. Predatory behaviour will always make use of fear. Ms Maxwell and, had he lived, her co-defendant, employed this means of control.
Investigators observed that many of the victims expressed fears about what Epstein might do to them, claiming that either he or Ghislaine had warned them to stay quiet. The bodyguards and private investigators employed by Epstein would have been experienced as a display of power, purposefully inducing fear.
A reporter from the Miami Herald observed; “I think they were extremely dangerous. I mean we don’t know, really, the lengths that he went to, to intimidate people who tried to expose what he was doing. But we know that there were plenty of people who were afraid and who felt that he was capable of doing really bad things.”
There is another fact that feeds the wish not to know and supports a well-established culture of denial about women who commit predatory sexual crime. It is the problem of male sexualisation and its inherent disavowing of vulnerability. Still in 2025, men are not allowed to own vulnerability and certainly not their victim experiences at the hands of women.
Over several decades now I have conducted treatment groups for men who have committed sexual crimes. Literally hundreds of men have sat in front of me in the familiar therapeutic circle. Without exception, in every group at least 3 or 4 men when accounting their sexual histories describe older women having sex with them whilst they were still children. They tell of these occasions with bravado, rampant male ego, often asserting that no harm was done, a rite of passage. But there they are, in treatment for the sexual crimes they have committed.
Seldom, if ever, have any of these women sexual offenders been investigated or brought to justice. But they exist and in much greater numbers than we would care to believe. Sexual abuse of a child can never be considered a ‘rite of passage’. Mrs Maxwell is not alone or unusual. Fact is, she and they are immensely dangerous.
Female or male, the task of predatory behaviour is not just about the supply of victims. It is equally about ensuring silence and power. Once these factors are established the rest is enabled. Ms Maxwell, her thinking and behaviour as with other predators, are not ‘less than’ in their role of commissioning crime. Indeed, one could argue that without the role of an accomplished predator such crimes could not be commissioned at all.
Br Stephen Morris FCC








